The first transaction, at 4:13:47 p.m. ET, moved approximately 499,865 $USDT, 325,587 USDC, 500,048 DAI and 0.9953 $ETH from Agglayer through the wallet to 0x24a9. Those assets were worth about $1.33 million.
The second transaction, at 4:24:59 p.m. ET, moved about 2.22 million $USDT from $NEAR’s Rainbow Bridge through the same wallet to the same recipient, worth approximately $2.22 million.
The Defiant calculated the dollar estimates using onchain token quantities and DefiLlama historical prices at or within one second of the transaction timestamps.
An earlier funding transaction, at 3:32:59 p.m. ET that day, sent about 0.09783 $ETH to 0x24a9 from Tornado Cash’s 0.1 $ETH pool.
What the Delegations Allowed
EIP-7702 lets an externally owned account—a wallet controlled by a private key—delegate execution to smart-contract code. A separate address can submit a transaction carrying the account’s signed authorization and pay its gas fees, while the delegated code executes in the authorizing wallet’s context.
That mechanism allowed 0x24a9 to execute the claims and transfers through 0x4943. Etherscan marks both delegation authorizations as valid. Their cryptographic validity does not establish who controlled the signing key or whether the wallet owner intended the transfers.
Days before the funds moved, onchain researcher stuckfunds.eth sent an Oct. 4 message telling the wallet’s owner that funds remained claimable from the two bridges. “Claim it yourself from this wallet,” the message said.
A further transaction, also submitted by 0x24a9, cleared 0x4943’s delegation immediately after the Rainbow Bridge claim in the same Ethereum block.