Inside the NFT Wash Trade: How Fake Volume Distorts the Market

The $NFT market has seen significant levels of wash trading, where traders engage in artificial trades to inflate trading volume. Data from Blur, OpenSea, and Magic Eden highlight this trend. Blur leads in wash trading volume with 18.88%, followed by Magic Eden at 27.98%. OpenSea has the lowest at 0.88%.

Among the collections, Blur and Magic Eden have high wash-trading levels. Blur’s total volume is $1.29 billion, with 18.88% attributed to wash trading, resulting in an organic volume of $1.05 billion. Magic Eden’s total volume is $206.66 million, with 27.98% wash trading, leaving an organic volume of $148.83 million.

OpenSea, the leading marketplace, has the least wash trading volume at $379 million, with only 0.88% wash trading, maintaining a healthy organic trading volume of $376 million.

Renowned $NFT collections also have varying wash trading volumes. Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) has the highest actual volume of $249.81 million, with $24.62 million attributed to wash trading. Mutant Ape Yacht Club (MAYC) follows with a volume of $127.58 million, including $12.08 million from wash trading. Collections like Azuki, Milady, and Ethlizards have lower wash trading volumes, suggesting different trading patterns across collections.

Source: Forte’s X account

Understanding wash trading and its patterns is crucial for traders. Common indicators include:

-Stable prices with no regard to the highly priced buy.

-Low social media interaction with high trading activities.

-Multiple trades involving the same buyer in a short period of time.

-A single address engaging in high-frequency trading of a specific $NFT.

Wash trading is prevalent in the $NFT market. Investors need to be well aware of this so they can identify red flags and the market dynamics to make informed investment decisions.