President Trump signed an executive order on Thursday that aims to make it easier to include alternative assets like private equity, cryptocurrency and real estate inside 401(k) and related employee retirement plans. Together, the accounts hold $12.2 trillion in retirement savings.
The order directs the Labor Department, which oversees retirement plans, to re-evaluate its fiduciary guidelines related to these investments, as well as to clarify its position on the proper process when offering funds that include alternative assets.
There is nothing explicitly prohibiting plan operators from adding these types of investments now, and it is still too early to know how aggressively federal regulators will interpret Mr. Trump’s green light and what the implications may be. But the embrace of alternatives is a significant shift from the Biden administration, which issued a warning about the dangers of crypto investing, something the Trump administration recently rescinded.
Still, the underlying law governing retirement accounts, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, isn’t changing. Known as ERISA, it requires fiduciaries — the employers or plan administrators entrusted with the plans — to act solely in the best interests of employees, which includes choosing prudent investment options.
Are Bitcoin and other volatile digital assets prudent investments? Regardless of any executive order, it’s a case that employers would need to consider and be able to defend, and they tend to tread carefully across all asset types.
Even though crypto has become increasingly available to mainstream investors through vehicles like exchange-traded funds, it remains a rare in retirement plan menus. Private equity, which involves investments that are not publicly traded, isn’t widely accessible to retirement investors at the moment, but some large financial services companies, including BlackRock, are developing products that contain them, including a target-date fund that is expected to be released in the first half of next year.
Arthur Laby, vice dean and a professor at Rutgers Law School, said executive orders are meaningful because they “add an important ingredient into the complex recipe” that determines when a fiduciary, such as an employer, has failed to uphold its duty. The orders can shape the national debate and direct federal agencies on how to carry out laws or policies — but they have limits.
“Executive orders can be influential, but they do not necessarily erase well-developed fiduciary law jurisprudence honed by the courts over many decades,” Mr. Laby added.
Employers have long been fearful of being sued for investment options that can be viewed as imprudent, or simply too expensive, which is why the shift isn’t expected to set off a rush to significantly overhaul 401(k) plan menus or load them up with digital assets like crypto, for example.
nytimes.com