F2Pool Co-Founder Wang Chun Moves $20.7M in ETH and WBTC to Spark Protocol

Onchain analyst @ai_9684xtpa flagged a series of rapid withdrawals from Binance early Friday that point to a notable repositioning by a major Chinese miner. The address 0xF42…f2b51, tied to F2Pool co-founder Wang Chun, pulled 7,650 $ETH and 124.18 WBTC—worth roughly $20.67 million—over four hours and then moved the entire sum into Spark Protocol, according to the original report.

F2Pool is one of the oldest and largest Bitcoin mining pools, and Wang Chun’s name carries weight in the ecosystem. For years miners generally took a binary approach to their treasuries: hold mined coins through cycles or sell a portion to cover power and operating costs. Moving $20.7 million in top-cap assets straight into a lending protocol doesn’t fit either of those familiar scripts. It suggests a deliberate allocation toward DeFi yield, and that deserves a closer look.

A Miner’s Capital Enters DeFi Lending

Spark Protocol is a lending platform originally spun out from the MakerDAO/Sky ecosystem. It accepts deposits of $ETH and WBTC, letting users earn variable yield or borrow against their collateral. For a miner sitting on idle reserves of Bitcoin and Ether, locking them in Spark can generate a return without having to sell core positions—an option that becomes more attractive when mining margins compress and liquid reserves sit in exchange accounts earning nothing.

The timing adds context. Bitcoin’s 2024 halving cut block rewards in half, a structural change that continues to pressure mining economics through 2026. Public miners have already been exploring new funding mechanisms, from equity raises to hash rate derivatives. A private figure like Wang Chun routing capital into Spark is a quieter but equally telling signal that large operators are treating onchain capital efficiency as a live priority, not a theoretical one.

Ethereum continues to lead blockchains in developer activity, underpinning most DeFi protocols, as recent weekly analysis confirms. That dominance means the composability of deposits in Spark can quickly be extended into other strategies—stablecoin borrowing, liquidity provision, or restaking—without leaving the Ethereum rails.

Liquidity and Institutional Confidence Signals

The volumes themselves are not market-moving. Institutional BTC and $ETH spot flows regularly exceed $20 million without causing ripples. But the onchain footprint is unmistakable. When a known mining figure withdraws WBTC from a centralized exchange and ships it into a DeFi protocol, it registers as a vote of confidence in both the protocol’s smart contract security and the broader DeFi stack.

WBTC, the tokenized Bitcoin on Ethereum, has often been a conduit for Bitcoin liquidity to flow into the Ethereum DeFi ecosystem. A withdrawal of this size from Binance, followed by a deposit into Spark, pulls Bitcoin-denominated collateral into an interest-bearing environment. That’s a slow but meaningful shift in how large holders treat wrapped Bitcoin—not just as a bridge asset for trading, but as a yield-bearing instrument.

It also comes as the tokenization of real-world assets continues to surge. Total onchain RWA value recently crossed the $20 billion mark, a milestone covered in a recent market roundup. While Spark isn’t an RWA protocol per se, the growth of institutional-grade DeFi infrastructure likely makes it easier for large miners to trust lending markets with serious capital.

What Stays Unclear

Onchain data alone can’t distinguish between a one-off treasury rotation and the start of a larger DeFi integration. The outflow from Binance might represent asset accumulation that happened over weeks, with the withdrawal and deposit merely the onchain settlement leg. Without seeing accompanying borrowing flows or subsequent collateral movements, market watchers can’t know whether Wang Chun intends to lever up against these deposits or simply earn passive yield.

Another open question is whether this signals a broader shift among China-based mining pools, many of which have historically been more conservative with onchain activity after regulatory crackdowns. If more pools follow suit and start moving treasury assets into lending protocols, the DeFi sector could see a new class of consistent liquidity providers emerge—ones whose capital behaves differently from VC funds or retail traders.

The movement is clear onchain: one of China’s best-known mining operators has deposited over $20 million in $ETH and WBTC into Spark. The reasoning behind it is less visible, but in a post-halving market where miners are searching for every edge, DeFi is becoming harder to ignore.