Fitts drew a sharp distinction between Bitcoin’s role as a digital asset and $XRP’s role as functional payment infrastructure. Her argument is not ideological but practical. Bitcoin, in her view, is not an efficient payment system and lacks the fundamental utility required for the cross-border settlement rails that financial institutions are rapidly building out.
She pointed to institutions actively integrating networks through Ripple and Stellar, using $XRP and XLM for cross-border payments, as evidence that the choice of infrastructure has already been made at the institutional level. The question is not which asset wins the debate. The question is which asset gets embedded into the system that moves money globally.
The Prototype Theory
Fitts also offered a broader framework for understanding how financial infrastructure gets built, one shaped by decades of watching how powerful institutions develop and deploy new systems.
Her observation is that the people who run financial systems always prototype. They test, iterate and build incrementally, often persuading talented developers to contribute by framing the project as something liberating rather than controlling. By the time the full picture becomes clear, the infrastructure is already embedded.
In that context, her view of Bitcoin is particularly pointed. She suggested the more likely scenario for Bitcoin going forward is that it gets sold to sovereign governments as the institutional whales who got in early look for an exit, rather than becoming foundational infrastructure for the next financial system.
$XRP, by contrast, is already doing the work that the next financial system requires: moving value across borders quickly, cheaply and at institutional scale.
coinpedia.org
