Long-Term VET Holders Express Concern After VeBetter DAO Reveal

• Doubts arise over VeChain’s historical milestones’ actual impact.
• Tools developed, but enterprise adoption remains a challenge.
• The VeFam bring their concerns to Sunny Lu hoping for transparency.

In a recent post, a seasoned VET holder voiced concerns over VeChain’s developmental milestones. This prompted reflections on the blockchain’s journey and future. In detail, the holder breaks down his concerns in a long TwitterX thread.

He starts off with a closer look at the blockchain’s timeline. Specifically, the holder questions the impact of historical milestones, pointing out partnerships and launches that seemingly lacked tangible results. Then he highlights the X-Node campaign’s unmet expectations and the unclear outcomes of collaborations like Draper Dragon and DNV GL.

His next remarks explore how developing tools require mass adoption. He says despite innovative tools, there is a lack of enterprise clients and governments adopting VeChain’s solutions. Thus, he raises questions about the six-year development of revolutionary tools without substantial traction.

Next he says there is no on-chain volume. He claims to bserve a notable absence of transaction volume on the VeChain blockchain compared to other platforms like ETH, ADA, and SOL. To which, he cites the NFT market as an example, where VeChain struggles to compete in transaction volume.

Additionally he throws light on the lack on stablecoins and criticises VeChain’s mission. He reflects on the evolution of VeChain’s mission from enterprise solutions to a sustainability initiative. The, expresses disheartenment as VeChain appears to divert from its initial goal of being the backbone for logistics infrastructure.

Next, he raises concerns about the complexity of VeChain’s evolving ecosystem with multiple tokens and governance mechanisms. Leading to questioning the potential barrier for new users in understanding and adopting the intricate model.

Adding on he raises concerns about potential exploitation of dApps incentivizing rewards, leading to hyperinflation and questions how the ecosystem plans to prevent misuse without creating high entry barriers.

As a long-term holder, the critic’s doubts reflect broader concerns within the community, prompting a closer examination of VeChain’s development trajectory. The VeFam seem to go on to encourage VeChain CEO, Sunny Lu, to be transparent and meet the community’s concerns.