Ethereum Foundation member, Justin Drake, said that the move would do well for security in the long-term,
Targeting 2^25 $ETH at stake (~32m $ETH) for the long term feels about right for strong security. In such conditions, the base inflation would be ~1% and the base return ~%3.2%. Assuming each shard consumes on average 1,000 $ETH in gas per year (about 100x less than what Eth1 consumes today), with half of the gas burnt, then inflation would be ~0.5% and the validator return ~5%. Feels healthy! If we get significantly less than 2^25 $ETH at stake then doubling the base inflation wouldn’t be unreasonable.
Drake also took into the account the fact that a certain number of Ether would be burnt, calculated that with 1000 $ETH spent on gas per shard annually, the inflation rate would amount to about 0.5%.
Community Members Seem to Appreciate the Proposal
The Ethereum cryptocommunity has generally welcomed the proposal, saying that the reward rate is more fair. One user, RTylerSmith, said,
I appreciate the issuance rate being reconsidered. The reports published about validating economics showed compelling evidence that this needed to be revised upwards. I agree that this “feels” more in line with what validators would expect and will help network security compete with alternative options like DeFi and other platforms. I expect to participate as a validator at these rates.