Cryptocurrency-based accounting for legal entities: myth, reality or responsibility?
Due to the lack of government's official position on the legal nature of cryptocurrency, there may be two options for considering it as a subject of the treaty. In the first case, cryptocurrency is considered as a means of payment. In this interpretation, contracts signed between legal entities, for example, a contract of sale, include the possibility of paying in rubles an amount equivalent to a certain amount in cryptocurrency. However, in this case, companies have to pay VAT. A similar method is used by M9 Developer, which added an option of selling real estate for bitcoins. The second approach to determining the essence of cryptocurrency is to consider them as a commodity. In this case, barter contracts or mixed contracts may be used, of where barter agreement would be an integral part.
When analyzing foreign experience, it becomes clear that there is no unified position on cryptocurrency-based accounting between legal entities, even in countries where regulators are positive to cryptocurrency. For example, in some European countries, cryptocurrency is completely legal for individuals who are free from paying taxes for transactions with cryptocurrency in some jurisdictions. In this case, deals between legal entities are prohibited. In this regard one of the most advanced countries at the moment is Japan. To use cryptocurrency, in particular bitcoin, in its day-to-day business, the company must have a cash reserve of $ 100,000 and regularly provide financial reports to the government along with an external audit in the tax service. And to issue and receive a license to work with digital gold, you must give $300,000. I should be noted that if the license is denied, the money will not be returned. Either companies should resort to the services of exchange points, which must meet the requirements specified above.
Thus, at the moment, despite all the actual simplicity and convenience of using cryptocurrency in mutual settlements between legal entities, this use is hampered by imperfect legislation and the complexity of compliance with tax law.