“We urge the industry to immediately form a security alliance together: unified security standards, intrusion detection protocols, and emergency response systems,” Han said. “Every crisis is an opportunity to rebuild trust. This time, we raise the bar higher.”
An industry-wide security alliance would help to organize efforts to manage this kind of incident, he said, strengthening industry links and communication to allow a faster response from companies like Circle and Tether, which froze over $2.3 billion in stablecoins on their own following initial reports of the Binance hack on Thursday afternoon.
In an article posted on X, Gate also proposed standardizing the vault approach, where no single party can move funds unilaterally. In this setup, each private key is split between three parties: the personal one, Gate, and a recovery partner. To access and move any funds, a threat actor would have to compromise at least two of them.
Also, vault withdrawals would face a 48-hour delay, giving the user the possibility of freezing funds even if two of these parties are compromised.
“We’re open to sharing the architecture behind this—the design principles and the hard lessons learned in real user scenarios—with anyone who wants to discuss it,” Gate declared.
“If more platforms adopt a similar approach to custody, the industry’s security baseline rises for everyone,” it concluded.
While Gate’s systems were not affected by Binance’s hack, the company offered its support, stressing that it flagged the relevant addresses and would freeze any illicit funds moved onto its platform.