Why One Hacked Server Can’t Move Funds
Whoever controls a private key can move the assets attached to it, and a confirmed blockchain transfer generally cannot be reversed. MPC splits signing authority into shares held in separate environments, which jointly produce a valid signature without the full key ever being assembled. A bank could, for example, spread three shares across different locations and require any two of them to approve each transaction.
$SHARE 1
Bank’s own hardware
$SHARE 3
Rival cloud provider
Any 2 of 3 sign → transaction approved
Illustrative two-of-three setup, not Google’s official architecture
With that structure, a single compromised environment cannot move funds and a single outage does not freeze them, and larger setups such as five-of-seven are also supported. Before signing, every request passes a policy engine running in Confidential Space, Google’s hardware-isolated computing environment, which can demand extra approvals for a large transfer to a newly added wallet. The service supports ECDSA signatures, used by Bitcoin and Ethereum, and Ed25519, used by Solana. Google’s release notes for the service show that on October 1 it expanded its Bitcoin policy rules to check transfer amounts, destination address types and change outputs, meaning the leftover coins a Bitcoin transaction returns to the sender’s own wallet. Google says customers keep control of their key material and that it cannot access it unencrypted, even when its own infrastructure holds one of the shares. It cannot stop enough authorized signers from colluding to meet the threshold, and the post-quantum protection Google mentions has no release date.
Jack Henry Puts 7,200 Lenders Within Reach
Google introduced Confidential Space in 2022 and published a reference architecture for MPC signing on it in April 2023, with Wells Fargo cited among the banks experimenting with the setup.
Swiss crypto bank AMINA, Incore Bank and Crypto Finance, the digital asset unit of Deutsche Börse, completed the second phase of a payment pilot on Google Cloud Universal Ledger (GCUL) in April, moving to account-to-account transfers for real clients. On October 16, Jack Henry, which supplies core banking software to more than 7,200 US community banks and credit unions, said it would become the first core banking technology provider to integrate with Google Cloud Universal Ledger. That gives those institutions a route to tokenized deposits, meaning ordinary bank deposits recorded as tokens on a shared ledger, although Jack Henry named no launch date and an earlier survey found 11% of its clients exploring the idea. Google has not said the MPC service will come bundled with GCUL.
Why Google Won’t Hold Client Assets
Institutional MPC and custody providers by model
Anchorage and BitGo hold client assets as custodians, while Google leaves custody and the regulatory burden attached to it inside the bank. Google Cloud already runs infrastructure for lenders such as Deutsche Bank under a partnership signed in 2020, and the new service explicitly lets a key share sit with a rival cloud, which addresses supervisors’ concerns about dependence on one vendor. The incumbents have years of live operations behind them, and Google has published no independent benchmarks for signing speed or recovery.
DORA Will Test the Multi-Cloud Pitch
Banks will want pricing and the names of the preview participants before committing. In the US, the OCC confirmed in March 2025 that national banks may offer crypto custody without prior supervisory approval, and in the EU, MiCA lets credit institutions provide custody of crypto assets after notifying their regulator. DORA requires them to document and manage every technology provider behind a critical function, a category a signing service plainly falls into, so splitting key shares between two clouds would build that redundancy into the setup from the start.
Google’s entry also changes the position of smaller MPC vendors that already run on its infrastructure. MPCVault was among the companies Google highlighted in 2023 for using its confidential computing technology inside an institutional MPC product, and the same cloud platform it relies on is now preparing a competing managed service for the banks it hopes to sign.