These moves have also been mapped by Chainalysis. In an X post published on Tuesday, the company stated that on April 1, the exploiter had moved the funds from the five wallets used for the exploitation to a single stopover wallet in 13 separate transactions. The exploiter allowed the wallet to remain dormant until the funds were deposited into the mixer in 100 $ETH tranches.
It is not the first round of cleaning the funds. An address called Drift Exploiter 4 sent 23,095 $ETH (about $44.4 million) to the same mixer on July 23 and 24.
What’s left in the wallets
In light of the deposits made on Tuesday, Arkham continues to track 81,454 $ETH worth somewhere around $194 million, according to TFTC. Somewhere around $198.58 million is in the 71 addresses that belong to the hacker. Additionally, these accounts contain around $561,600 worth of USDT, $USDC, Solana, and USDY, as well as one Fartcoin worth roughly 15 cents, according to Arkham’s portfolio view.
The Drift Protocol exploiter, who stole over $270M, is moving $ETH to #TornadoCash after 2 months of inactivity.
Over the past 2 hours, the exploiter has deposited 25,700 $ETH ($61.56M) into #TornadoCash and still holds 81,864 $ETH ($195M).
https://t.co/FRtFrS7rew https://t.co/9ISUIlkHvT
— Lookonchain (@lookonchain) October 20, 2026
In the first place, the hack hit a Solana protocol. However, the hacker later used bridge technology to turn the funds into $ETH. In accordance with Drift’s asset distribution table, the hacker made off with $295.7 million worth of tokens, of which $159.3 million is JLP (the Jupiter Liquidity Provider Token) and $71.4 million is $USDC.
How the attackers got in
According to the post-mortem written by Drift at drift.trade, the attack on April 1 did not exploit any vulnerability in the code, but instead used social engineering methods over six months. TFTC, quoting the same source, indicated how the attackers posed as a trading company and parked $1 million worth of actual money to establish themselves, while also personally meeting Drift contributors at conferences. They exploited a code execution vulnerability through developer tooling combined with a fake wallet application to drain the protocol in less than 12 minutes.
In a June 3rd post about their recovery efforts, Drift stated that according to a Mandiant forensic investigation, the attack was performed by UNC6862, a threat actor from North Korea. Drift cited Mandiant’s statement that there are “direct ties to other state-sponsored actors involved in similar attacks on other platforms.”
A recovery pool against long odds
Drift opened up claims for its DFX tokens on October 1st. The pool had $3.1 million at the time and was set to grow based on any exchange profits and clawbacks. In terms of the $295 million in losses, those who claimed early were looking at just a penny on the dollar.
Around $9.2 million has been frozen by law enforcement, as per TFTC, which is nearly 3 cents on the dollar. Given that $194 million is in the hands of the exploiter and an increasing portion of it has been deposited into Tornado Cash, recovery does not seem very likely. OFAC blacklisted the mixer in 2022, but there is no confirmation of any clawback on a Tornado Cash deposit by a DPRK-linked entity.
The Drift exploit stands as the third-largest crypto hack in 2026 based on the DeFiLlama crypto exploits tracker, behind the $387.5 million Bitget exploit and the $320 million Liquid Network exploit.