en
Back to the list

Shevchenko Gives NEAR Intents Attacker 48 Hours

source-logo  thedefiant.io 02 October 2026 04:36, UTC
image

Alex Shevchenko, general manager of $NEAR Intents, told the attacker who drained a preliminary $3.8 million from the cross-chain protocol that he has been identified and has 48 hours to send the money back.

“We have identified you, sir,” Shevchenko wrote on X at 8:18 p.m. ET on Oct. 1, listing a Bitcoin address, one for $BNB Chain and Ethereum, and one for Solana. “You know better than most how responsible disclosure works — this is the last window to use it. After 48 hours, that window closes.”

The post sets a deadline and names no bounty. $NEAR Intents runs two disclosure programs covering the code involved, and each pays at most $300,000.

Know when your
coins move

Alerts, real-time prices, and market news — all in one app
qr-code Point your phone camera to install
4.8 based on 40K reviews in the App Store and Google Play

Three Fresh Addresses

None of the three addresses held the funds as of 1:15 a.m. UTC on Oct. 2. The Bitcoin address has never recorded a transaction, Blockstream data shows. The address given for $BNB Chain and Ethereum holds no ether, no $BNB and no USDT or USDC on either network, and has never sent a transaction.

The Solana address was funded with 0.005 $SOL at 12:04 a.m. UTC on Oct. 2, 13 minutes before the post. It sent 0.001 $SOL out five minutes later, holds 0.004 $SOL and owns no token accounts.

Shevchenko posted the message from his personal account. The $NEAR Intents account has not posted since its incident statement on Oct. 1, which said a detailed report would follow “in the following days.”

A $300,000 Ceiling

$NEAR Intents runs two bug bounty programs on HackenProof. The bridges program lists the Omni Bridge contract and $NEAR's multi-party computation network among its targets and pays $10,000 to $300,000 for a critical finding. The smart-contracts program covers the near/intents repository and pays $100,000 to $300,000. Both cap high and critical rewards at 10% of the funds a vulnerability practically affects, and both tell researchers to “perform testing on a private testnet wherever possible.”

$NEAR Intents attributed the incident to a bug in how the Omni deposit and withdrawal infrastructure interacted with its smart contract, code that sits across both programs.

Four Days Earlier

Shevchenko published a report on Sept. 28 on how $NEAR Intents handled funds from the Bitget breach, which the exchange puts at $387.5 million. He said the protocol's SHIELD risk layer detected more than $50 million in attempted laundering flows, that $166,000 passed through and that it froze $503,000 mid-execution. He described the figures as indicative and rounded, within 10% of the true values.

Shevchenko said $NEAR Intents was waiving its claim on the 5%-plus-5% recovery bounty Bitget announced, so the exchange could recover more.

“$NEAR Intents is not a place for laundering stolen assets,” he wrote.

Services Back, Token Down

$NEAR Intents halted services on Oct. 1 and said losses would be compensated in full. Shevchenko quoted a near.com post saying the product was back up 57 minutes later. The protocol had said deposits and withdrawals on 11 networks would stay off for roughly 12 more hours; that window has elapsed.

$NEAR fell 8.7% in 24 hours, CoinGecko data showed at 1:19 a.m. UTC on Oct. 2. The token is up 5.1% over seven days and ranks 21st by market value.

Total value locked in $NEAR Intents is $222.3 million, down from $248.1 million at the start of Oct. 1, DefiLlama data shows. The protocol handled $4.7 billion of swap volume over the past 30 days.

$NEAR Intents has not named the attacker, published the exploit transactions or given a token-by-token breakdown of the loss. It said it reported the incident to law enforcement and is working with analytics partners to trace the funds.

thedefiant.io