For years, Kazakhstan was one of the world’s top destinations for Bitcoin mining, with operators drawn by cheap electricity and relatively lax oversight. At its peak, the country ranked among the top three nations globally for Bitcoin hashrate. That informal crypto mining boom strained the national grid so badly that Kazakhstan imposed restrictions and taxes on mining operations starting in 2022.
From crypto mining to formal compute
CoreWeave started as a crypto mining operation and now generates $1.9B in revenue from leasing Nvidia GPUs to AI companies. It went from mining Ethereum to becoming one of the most sought-after cloud compute providers in the world.
Rather than hosting thousands of small, informal mining operations that strain the grid and generate minimal tax revenue, the government wants to attract formalized, large-scale data center operators who pay proper rates and contribute to the broader economy.
What this means for crypto and compute investors
Kazakhstan’s formalization push is part of a worldwide pattern. Governments that once tolerated or ignored crypto mining are now either taxing it heavily, banning it, or channeling the same energy toward AI infrastructure. For Bitcoin miners specifically, this means the list of friendly jurisdictions continues to shrink, pushing hashrate toward countries with clearer regulatory frameworks, like the US and parts of Latin America.
Kazakhstan’s $1.9B project is meaningless if the country can’t generate enough electricity to run it. The government has acknowledged this by making the project timeline contingent on resolving the deficit.
For investors in decentralized compute protocols like Akash, Render, or io.net, the centralization of AI compute in sovereign-backed megaprojects represents both a threat and a validation. The threat is obvious: governments and hyperscalers have deeper pockets. The validation is that compute scarcity is real enough for nations to stake billions on it, which is exactly the market condition that makes decentralized alternatives attractive to smaller buyers who can’t compete for capacity in government-backed facilities.