Citadel Securities raised concerns about the CFTC’s self-certification process, which allows registered trading venues to certify that new products comply with applicable rules and potentially begin trading the following business day.
By comparison, SEC-regulated venues generally face a formal review process that includes public comment and affirmative SEC approval.
Citadel Securities also warned that trading venues could rely on the CFTC’s self-certification process to sidestep SEC jurisdiction. The firm argued that KPI contracts are security-based swaps, making them subject to the SEC’s regulatory authority.
The firm separately raised concerns over equity-linked perpetual derivatives, saying they could push trading activity outside the SEC’s existing surveillance and investor-protection framework.
Citadel Securities urged both agencies to reaffirm SEC jurisdiction over equity-linked products, prevent self-certification from being used to circumvent that jurisdiction and promptly clarify the regulatory treatment of event contracts and perpetual derivatives.