Did a Spanish Football Club Use Prediction Markets to Offset Relegation Risk?

• Osasuna bought €1.2 million in relegation insurance through Howden, with coverage that would have paid €6 million if the club dropped from La Liga.
• The hedge reportedly involved a Kalshi prediction-market bet, while Susquehanna was said to be the counterparty and Game Point Capital helped structure the trade.
• Osasuna survived on goal difference, lost the hedge and faces questions as Spain temporarily bans prediction markets for alleged gambling authorization failures.

Spanish football club Osasuna put a modern twist on football finance after revealing that it bought relegation insurance through broker Howden, a policy reportedly linked to a Kalshi prediction-market bet. The club paid €1.2 million, or about $1.4 million, for coverage that would have paid €6 million, or $6.9 million, if relegated. The strange question is whether insurance quietly became a market trade, because the structure appears to blur risk management, sports betting and regulated club finance.

Relegation insurance collides with prediction markets

Osasuna said documents from Howden and LaLiga confirm that similar policies are routinely used by clubs and sports organizations to protect against financial contingencies. The club also said the purchase was reported to the chairman of its Control Commission and that auditors were informed, with a commission report expected in the coming days. The official framing is ordinary financial protection, but the reported use of Kalshi makes the arrangement feel less ordinary.

The hedge only became visible because Osasuna survived. The club lost its final match against Getafe 1-0, but goal difference kept it in 17th place, narrowly above the relegation line. That meant Osasuna stayed in the top flight and lost the hedge rather than collecting the payout. The result created a surreal financial outcome, where sporting survival came with the loss of a protection trade that would only have paid if the worst-case scenario happened.

The reported counterparties add another layer. Trading firm Susquehanna was said to be on the other side of the relegation trade, with risk analysis firm Game Point Capital involved in structuring it. Osasuna’s statement, however, mentioned only Howden and did not name Kalshi, Susquehanna or Game Point Capital. That silence leaves the mechanics partly opaque, especially for fans trying to understand whether their club bought insurance, entered a prediction market position, or did both through intermediaries.

The timing is awkward for the wider sector. Three days after Osasuna’s final game, Spain temporarily banned prediction markets such as Kalshi and Polymarket for three to four months, citing alleged lack of gambling authorization. The broader issue is whether event markets are becoming financial hedges or unauthorized betting venues, a line now being tested across European football, regulation and trading platforms.