Besides, the outcome of this case could have lasting implications for the entire crypto market, potentially reshaping how digital assets are regulated in the U.S.
Interestingly, attorney Fred Rispoli reacted to the post saying that while he doesn’t believe Andrew’s sources when they have negative things to say about $XRP, but he does believe them when they are positive. “That’s not hypocrisy. It’s unbridled hope.” he quoted.
Injunction: The Major Hurdle
Furthermore, Crypto lawyer Bill Morgan reacted to Andrew’s post and remarked that while the first and third points make sense, the injunction is still a problem. While Judge Torres’ ruling suggests that $XRP could be seen as a commodity, however the permanent injunction limits Ripple’s ability to sell $XRP to U.S. institutions, which creates uncertainty around that aspect.
First and third bullet points are plausible but something needs to happen regarding the injunction. The reasoning of judge Torres in the summary judgement decision is consistent with the $XRP token being classified in any regulatory framework as a commodity but the permanent… https://t.co/a1vmf2Pe8k
— bill morgan (@Belisarius2020) March 17, 2025
Previously, FOX Business journalist Eleanor Terrett had also hinted that the Ripple lawsuit could be ending soon. This comes as the SEC works to freeze or end legal actions against other crypto companies like Coinbase, Binance, Uniswap, and Consensys.
Several crypto experts had reacted to the report. Crypto expert Yassin Mobarak, founder of Dizer Capital, had stated that Ripple probably doesn’t view the $125 million fine as a problem, as they could pay it easily. He emphasized that the injunction is a significant issue, preventing a resolution of the lawsuit. He believes Ripple is negotiating to have the injunction lifted, which currently blocks it from selling $XRP to institutions.