en.coinotag.com
Bitnomial’s Lawsuit Against SEC Suggests Possible Reconsideration of XRP Futures Classification
- The cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve as Bitnomial initiates legal action against the SEC.
- This lawsuit underscores the regulatory challenges that crypto derivatives exchanges face amid ongoing jurisdictional disputes.
- “Bitnomial disagrees with the SEC’s view that XRP is an investment contract,” the firm asserts in their court filing.
Bitnomial challenges SEC’s jurisdiction over XRP Futures while questioning the classification of XRP as a security in a landmark lawsuit.
Bitnomial’s Legal Challenge Against the SEC
In a significant development for the cryptocurrency sector, Bitnomial, a crypto derivatives exchange, has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and its chair, Gary Gensler, along with four other commissioners. The crux of the matter revolves around the SEC’s assertion that Bitnomial’s XRP Futures product falls under its jurisdiction and allegedly violates federal securities laws. According to the court documents submitted on Thursday, the SEC views XRP as an investment contract, asserting that its derivatives require scrutiny from both the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
The Controversy Surrounding XRP Futures
Bitnomial’s stance starkly opposes the SEC’s classification of XRP as a security. The exchange argues that XRP Futures should not be regulated as security futures, as it believes XRP does not meet the criteria of an investment contract. Notably, Bitnomial highlights that its proposed XRP Futures product had already received self-certification from the CFTC, indicating a measure of regulatory compliance. The court filing details how the SEC imposed onerous requirements that virtually obstruct Bitnomial from launching XRP Futures contracts, including a compulsory registration as a national securities exchange.
Regulatory Landscape and XRP
The legal tussle over the classification of XRP has been ongoing since the SEC brought forth allegations against Ripple, XRP’s issuer, in 2020. Ripple was accused of raising $1.3 billion through the sale of unregistered securities. Subsequent rulings by the Southern District Court of New York have provided a mixed bag of outcomes. Judge Analisa Torres previously ruled that Ripple’s “programmatic sales,” which involved sales with unspecified buyers, were not in violation of securities laws. Conversely, the judge deemed Ripple’s institutional sales as unlawful, leading to a fine of $125 million against an initial SEC calculation of $2 billion in penalties.
Current Status of Ripple’s Legal Battle
As the situation unfolds, the legal contention indicates that both Ripple and the SEC might claim victories based on differing areas of the court’s ruling. The SEC announced its intention to appeal the latest court decision, while Ripple initiated a cross-appeal. This ongoing legal fracture exemplifies the broader struggles facing digital assets within traditional regulatory frameworks.