coinpedia.org
The SEC vs Binance lawsuit witnessed a fiery oral argument session on the January 22 (Monday) court hearing. Mathew Gregory and the counsel representing Binance faced criticism from Federal Judge Jackson regarding its arguments to toss out SEC’s complaint against Binance. On the other hand, the SEC has yet to defend its jurisdiction on cryptocurrency.
Major Arguments
The SEC’s main arguments allege that Binance trades crypto assets on its platform as securities falling under the commission’s regulatory oversight. The SEC accuses Binance of inflating trading volumes, diverting funds, and facilitating unregistered securities trading.
Binance’s lawyer, Matthew Gregory, did not hold back on showing the SEC’s confusing and conflicting signals to the crypto industry. This marks one of Binance’s major legal challenges in the U.S., following a $4.3 billion settlement with the Department of Justice in November. Even the ex-CEO, Changpeng ‘CZ’ Zhao, left his position after pleading guilty.
Binance has urged U.S. Judge Amy Berman Jackson to toss out the SEC’s lawsuit, alleging the firm is breaking security rules, committing fraud, and misappropriating investor funds.
Matthew Gregory, in his arguments, said, “The SEC to this day has been talking out of both sides of its mouth when it comes to crypto tokens … They’re telling the industry (to) come in and register, while simultaneously with their other hand holding the door closed and preventing any viable path to do that.”
The definition of “security” has been outlined in the Securities Act of 1933. However, Supreme Court cases are often followed as precedents for clearing confusion regarding an asset falling under the definition of ‘security’ or not. The key test evaluates whether people invest in a common enterprise with profit expectations.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission took advantage of it and defended its stance by alleging that there is “no bright line” to make the distinction and the definition of what falls under ‘security’ can be compromised as per the given case and circumstances.
U.S. Federal Judge Amy Berman Jackson questioned both sides, expressing skepticism about Binance’s argument on invoking new crypto regulation rules when previous cases have shown that security laws are “for flexibility and investor protection.”
Monday’s fiery courtroom saga was similar to last week’s Coinbase hearing but differs in that the SEC’s case against Binance includes fraud and market manipulation allegations. As the crypto industry watches closely, Judge Jackson challenged the SEC to define the limits of its jurisdiction over digital assets, highlighting the ongoing struggle between regulators and the increasingly sophisticated crypto firms.
The outcome of these legal battles will undoubtedly shape the regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies, influencing how they are traded, regulated, and recognized by U.S. authorities.