en
Back to the list

Gold ETF Inflows Hit $3B in July After Recent Outflows: What’s Driving Gold ETF Inflows?

source-logo  coinedition.com 2 h
image

Global gold exchange-traded funds returned to net buying in July after investors withdrew money broadly during May and June. The funds attracted $3 billion globally, marking their strongest monthly intake since April and reversing the recent selling cycle. Their physical holdings increased by 23 tonnes in one month, while total assets under management rose 1% to $530 billion. The July rebound arrived as gold ended four straight monthly declines and recovered from prices near $4,000 per ounce.

European funds accounted for most July buying by dollar value, while Asian and North American products also recorded positive flows. The move contrasted sharply with smaller monthly additions across US spot Bitcoin ETFs, which attracted only $172.4 million. Both markets recorded net inflows, although their regional scope, asset structures, flow scale, and investor bases differed materially. Gold then climbed further after US employers unexpectedly cut 23,000 jobs in July, reducing near-term Fed rate-hike expectations.

Gold ETF Inflows Reverse Two-Month Outflows

Global physically backed gold ETFs received $3 billion during July, according to the World Gold Council. That result followed $2 billion of withdrawals in May and $8.9 billion during June. July flows raised collective holdings from 4,047 tonnes to 4,068 tonnes. Holdings sat 108 tonnes below February’s 4,176-tonne record.

BREAKING: Global physical gold-backed ETFs posted +$3.0 billion in inflows in July, the largest monthly intake since April.

This pushed global gold ETF holdings up +23 tonnes, to 4,068 tonnes, just below the all-time high of 4,176 tonnes posted on February 27th.

European funds… pic.twitter.com/VktX3yyf2A

— The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) August 7, 2026

Year-to-date inflows reached $11 billion through July, representing a 39-tonne rise in physical holdings. Asian-listed funds contributed the largest share during that seven-month period, followed by European products. North America recorded inflows during July but stayed negative for the year. Regional differences limited the rebound across major markets.

July increased global gold ETF assets under management by about $4 billion from June’s $526 billion. New fund subscriptions and the higher gold price both contributed to the 1% monthly increase. However, holdings provided the direct measure of physical metal added by the funds. The 23-tonne rise reversed part of the 74-tonne reduction recorded during June.

Gold prices also recovered during the period, ending a four-month losing run with an approximate 2% July gain. Market charts on Friday placed spot gold near $4,343, up about 2.4% during the session. Gold futures traded near $4,397 after moving above $4,400 earlier. The rise followed a US jobs report that recorded a 23,000 decline in July payrolls.

Europe and Lower Prices Drive Demand

Meanwhile, European gold ETFs attracted about $2 billion, recording their second-largest monthly inflow of 2026. UK-listed funds added $875 million, while Swiss products received $657 million during the monthly rebound. Those two markets have each collected more than $2 billion during 2026. Together, their year-to-date intake reached roughly $5 billion by July 31.

Asian funds added $616 million, with Chinese products leading the regional total. The CSI 300 recorded its weakest month since January 2016, while local bond yields declined. Indian gold ETFs attracted another $157 million during July. Japanese products recorded withdrawals as rising domestic yields increased the income available from interest-bearing assets.

The World Gold Council linked July demand to re-entry near lower prices and portfolio diversification during technology-sector volatility. Gold traded near $4,000 after several monthly declines and heavy June redemptions. Policy uncertainty and US-Iran tensions also supported hedging activity, although firm yields limited North American buying. Funds in Australia, South Africa, and other markets collectively added $140 million.

North American funds received only $71 million after two months of regional selling. That amount left the region as 2026’s only major market with net outflows by July 31. Meanwhile, Europe recorded broad buying across several listed products rather than one dominant fund. The regional data also separated China’s inflows from Japan’s withdrawals and India’s smaller additions.

Gold ETF Flows Outpace Bitcoin Funds

By comparison, US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $172.4 million of net inflows during July. The products posted positive flows during 13 trading days and withdrawals during nine sessions. Their average daily flow reached $7.8 million across the month. Gold’s $3 billion global total was about 17 times larger, although it covered funds across several regions.

Bitcoin ETF activity also varied sharply throughout July, unlike the single monthly total reported for global gold funds. US products lost $424.7 million on July 13, their largest daily withdrawal that month. They later received $233.1 million on July 30 before losing $265.4 million on July 31. Those daily changes left the full-month result modestly positive.

August data recorded a faster Bitcoin ETF intake after the July close. US funds collected $170.1 million on August 3 and $211.5 million on August 4. They added $244.4 million on August 5 and another $137.6 million on August 6. Those four sessions produced $763.6 million in combined inflows, exceeding Bitcoin funds’ entire July total.

Cumulative US spot Bitcoin ETF net inflows reached $52.14 billion through August 6. BlackRock’s IBIT accounted for $61.09 billion, while Fidelity’s FBTC contributed $10 billion. Grayscale’s GBTC recorded cumulative withdrawals of $27.46 billion, reducing the combined industry net total. These fund-level differences explain why gross buying can exceed the market’s reported net inflow.

Gold and Bitcoin Fill Different Roles

However, positive flows do not establish direct competition between the two ETF markets. Gold funds hold physical metal, while spot Bitcoin funds hold a digitally issued asset with a fixed supply limit. Gold serves central banks, jewelry buyers, and manufacturers through physical markets. Bitcoin operates on a public network and trades continuously across global digital-asset venues.

Both assets share scarcity themes and sit outside direct issuance by national governments. Yet their prices can respond differently to liquidity, interest rates, currency moves, and market stress. NYDIG research recorded Bitcoin’s correlation with gold near zero during the fourth quarter of 2025. That relationship indicates their short-term prices did not consistently move closely together during that period.

Some regulated products already place both assets within one investment vehicle. A US-listed fund launched in January with exposure to gold, Bitcoin, silver, and other metals. Its structure requires at least 25% of assets in gold. The product combines both assets within one regulated structure.

For fund investors, July data provides separate measures of demand, holdings, regional activity, and daily volatility. Gold ETF assets reached $530 billion globally, while Bitcoin funds reported separate US net-flow figures. However, those figures measure different categories and should not serve as direct market-size comparisons. Gold data covers global funds, while the Bitcoin total covers US-listed spot products.

Related: Tether Shuts Down Gold-Backed Stablecoin aUSDT

coinedition.com