en.coinotag.com
-
The Ethereum Foundation is currently embroiled in a public dispute with Geth team lead Péter Szilágyi over funding, client development, and the future of Ethereum’s primary execution client.
-
Szilágyi accuses the Foundation of attempting to spin out Geth with a $5 million offer and secretly backing a competing client at Nethermind, raising concerns about transparency and decentralization.
-
EF leadership denies plans to phase out Geth, emphasizing continued support, but community unease persists amid strategic shifts within the Foundation.
Ethereum Foundation faces internal conflict as Geth lead Péter Szilágyi reveals $5M spinout offers and secret funding of rival client, sparking decentralization concerns.
Ethereum Foundation and Geth Team Clash Over Client Funding and Future
The Ethereum Foundation (EF) finds itself at the center of a heated debate following public allegations by Péter Szilágyi, the lead developer of Geth, Ethereum’s most widely used execution client. Szilágyi revealed that the Foundation has repeatedly proposed a $5 million spinout offer to the Geth team, encouraging them to form an independent company. This move has raised alarms about EF’s commitment to maintaining Geth as an integral part of Ethereum’s infrastructure.
Geth plays a critical role in the Ethereum network, powering a majority of nodes responsible for validating transactions and securing the blockchain. Szilágyi’s accusations suggest a strategic pivot within EF, potentially shifting focus away from direct client development toward research and educational initiatives. This has sparked debate about the long-term implications for Ethereum’s stability and decentralization.
Accusations of Secret Funding and Client Fragmentation
Adding to the controversy, Szilágyi claimed that EF has been covertly funding a parallel Geth implementation team at Nethermind, a competing client development group, without informing the original Geth developers. This alleged lack of transparency has fueled concerns within the Ethereum community about governance and trust in the Foundation’s management of core infrastructure.
Szilágyi publicly challenged EF leadership to deny these claims, referencing multiple discussions dating back to February 2025 where the spinout proposal was reportedly raised. The dispute underscores tensions between maintaining a unified client ecosystem and diversifying client development to enhance network resilience.