Hanke argued the divergence shows that when investors prioritize capital preservation, they choose gold, reinforcing his view of Bitcoin as “fool’s gold.”
BITCOIN = FOOL'S GOLD. pic.twitter.com/oQ3sxQrENi
— Steve Hanke (@steve_hanke) January 25, 2026
Gold’s rally to new record high
Notably, gold’s rally has been driven by elevated geopolitical risk, persistent inflation concerns, and aggressive central-bank buying, particularly by emerging markets, reinforcing its role as a widely accepted defensive asset.
Bitcoin, by contrast, has traded more like a speculative risk asset. Despite wider institutional access through spot ETFs, it has remained below key long-term trend levels and failed to track gold during periods of market stress.
Hanke has long criticized Bitcoin on fundamental grounds, arguing it lacks intrinsic economic value because it generates no income, represents no claim on productive assets, and is not widely used as a unit of account.
He has also warned against governments or corporations holding Bitcoin as a reserve asset, citing added volatility and misallocation of capital.
The scholar has rejected the idea of Bitcoin as digital gold, arguing that scarcity alone does not create value without stability, broad monetary use, or economic backing. In his view, Bitcoin’s price is driven mainly by speculation and momentum rather than fundamentals.
Featured image via Shutterstock