However, Arkham’s wallet movement data cannot prove sales versus internal moves. The “47,000 $BTC sold” line was inferred from transactions, not confirmed disposals. This MSTR bitcoin holdings change stemmed from arkham wallet movement data, not definitive sell orders. That said, market chatter often mistakes transfers for exits.
How michael saylor bitcoin denial unfolded
However, Saylor denied selling $BTC on X and pushed back on the narrative. He addressed the rumor after it circulated widely on Friday, reinforcing his long-stated stance. Coverage echoed his rebuttal, including StreetInsider’s summary of the denial.
Why transfers can mimic sales
Moreover, there are well-known blockchain analytics limitations. Labeling shows movement, not intent. A shift between wallets or custodians can resemble selling, which is a common bitcoin custodial transfers explanation. Arkham itself has outlined what its labels capture, as detailed in Arkham labels for MicroStrategy $BTC.
Ultimately, the debate shows how fast inferences spread before context catches up. For readers tracking michael saylor bitcoin, the key is simple: on-chain activity highlights transfers, while confirmed sales require clear evidence beyond wallet movements.