finbold.com
As Bitcoin’s popularity has grown, the controversy over its energy consumption and environmental impact has also intensified.
According to a recent report published on January 25, 2022, by CoinShares, Bitcoin accounted for just 0.08% of the world’s carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in 2021, indicating that talking points criticizing the network’s power usage appear to have been inflated.
The study stated:
“At 0.08 % of global CO2e emissions, removing the entire mining network from global demand—and thereby depriving hundreds of millions of people of their only hope for a fair and accessible form of money—would not amount to anything more than a rounding error.
The research presents the most up-to-date information on the current condition of the Bitcoin mining sector, as well as information on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) problems.
As per the data:
“At an annual energy draw of 89 TWh, the Bitcoin mining network uses approximately 0.05% of the total energy consumed globally.
Bitcoin environmental debate
Since Bitcoin first emerged, debates about the flagship cryptocurrency’s energy consumption and indirect environmental effect have recurred, becoming a perennial topic that tends to be revived with each subsequent market cycle.
In particular, the report established a complete model to predict emissions and a>
“In the grand scheme of things, the carbon emissions emitted by electricity providers supplying the Bitcoin mining network are inconsequential.”
Specifically, ESG concerns have motivated a number of corporations to withdraw or discuss discontinuing support for Bitcoin. For instance, Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) had previously suspended Bitcoin payments citing environmental concerns.