Yet with his wealth of investment experience, Pliego finds Bitcoin a more rewarding acquisition than real estate. Interestingly, he called owning a house “expensive,” stressing that, contrary to popular opinion, it is not an investment.
While the billionaire investor admires the concept of buying a property, he explicitly states that those who own them as investments are doing the wrong thing. He insisted that stacking Bitcoin was a more lucrative venture than real estate.
Meanwhile, Pliego’s portfolio is a testament to his staunch belief in the nascent digital asset. In a recent disclosure, he revealed that he holds a staggering 70% of his wealth in Bitcoin and Bitcoin-related vehicles. With his net worth exceeding $5.8 billion, his stash of the premier asset would surely amount to a lot.
Bitcoin vs. Real Estate Debate
Notably, the real estate market has its lure as the go-to sector for legacy investments. While it offers stable and modest returns, Bitcoin has outperformed it outright in the last few years.
For perspective, real estate returned 36.9% between 2017 and 2024, while Bitcoin appreciated nearly 2,000% in the same timeframe.
Meanwhile, a recent report from JP Morgan highlighted that US housing prices could increase by a mere 3% in 2025. Furthermore, it highlighted a trend of dwindling demand as economic mishaps have driven interest from the market to more lucrative enterprises.
However, Bitcoin’s demand is off the charts lately, as institutional and retail investors turn to the asset. With growing adoption, market observers have tipped the pioneering cryptocurrency to continue its northward drive.
Moreover, Bitcoin’s low maintenance, minimal taxation, and digital features make it preferable to real estate, which is immobile and expensive to maintain.