cryptonewsland.com
- With faster blockchains now enabling speeds of over 100,000 TPS and nearly instantaneous finality, Bitcoin’s potential is limited by its antiquated TPS.
- As flexible blockchains continue to advance in cryptocurrency, Bitcoin’s centralized governance stifles innovation and puts it at risk.
- BTC faces security threats as fees fall short of funding; forced inflation or “death spiral” risks could impact investor trust.
Bitcoin (BTC) is increasingly seen as outdated, with its technological and economic flaws sparking concern across the crypto industry. BTC’s limited transaction speed, which maxes out at a modest 7-13 transactions per second (TPS), falls far behind the capabilities of emerging blockchain technologies.
1/9) BTC is a dinosaur; the technology is ridiculously out-of-date
— Justin Bons (@Justin_Bons) October 27, 2024
At an embarrassing 7-13 max Transaction-Per-Second, it is in a position to disrupt nothing
All while being the most inefficient possible, as it excels at nothing
From utility to economics, BTC is a failure: 🧵
Competing networks now boast transaction speeds of over 100,000 TPS, offering finality within 1-6 seconds, a stark contrast to BTC’s 10-60 minute finality window. As crypto networks evolve, BTC’s limitations have become hard to ignore, raising questions about its sustainability.
Governance Issues and Inflexibility
A key factor limiting BTC’s progress lies in its governance. While theoretically capable of adopting new technology, BTC’s development has been restricted by a small group of influential holders. This centralized control has prevented necessary upgrades, creating systemic flaws in BTC’s adaptability.
Significantly, this governance issue may lead BTC to a critical tipping point. Unlike adaptable blockchains, BTC’s inability to evolve could cause it to fall behind as the broader crypto ecosystem continues advancing.
Looming Security Model Crisis
BTC’s security model faces a potential breakdown within the next decade, primarily due to its fee structure and block size limitations. As transaction fees fail to adequately fund security, BTC may face a forced inflation increase beyond its capped supply of 21 million.
For investors, this poses a considerable risk, as BTC’s once-predictable model could require drastic adjustments. Consequently, BTC’s stability may be at stake, with a potential “death spiral” scenario on the horizon.
If BTC’s price drops rapidly, miners may leave the network, reducing its hashrate and amplifying network congestion. Additionally, BTC’s difficulty adjustment algorithm only updates biweekly, which could deepen a hypothetical panic, restricting transaction capacity and slowing down the network further. This self-reinforcing cycle risks creating a “bank-run” scenario that few cryptocurrencies can afford.
A Call for Industry Awareness
As BTC’s limitations become increasingly visible, some industry insiders argue that its influence may be misplaced. With networks like Ethereum, Solana, and Avalanche offering more efficient and adaptable platforms, BTC’s continued dominance could hinder the broader industry’s progress. Awareness of these risks has become more critical, especially as the global crypto market matures.