blockchainreporter.net
Dogecoin and Ethereum managed to trade higher even as the overall crypto market slipped and Bitcoin dipped back toward the mid-$60,000s. This contrast (altcoins in the green while Bitcoin fades a bit) highlights a market that’s still fragile, with traders reacting to macro catalysts, tech-stock weakness, and liquidation-driven swings.
Dogecoin and Ethereum buck the trend in a soft tape
After closing the day, the total cryptocurrency market value was down about 1.6% over 24 hours, sliding below $2.4 trillion, while Bitcoin fell roughly 1.4% to around $67,500. In that context, even small gains in large-cap altcoins stood out. Dogecoin rose about 0.7% to roughly $0.101, and Ethereum edged up about 0.4% to near $1,994, still below the psychological $2,000 level. Those were the only major tokens “trending in the green” during the session, with Dogecoin chatter running hot while Ethereum sentiment was more cautious.
That doesn’t mean we are in an “altcoin season” nowadays, as most of the board remains red despite the good results of those two. XRP was slightly lower and other large alts such as Solana, BNB, and Cardano were down more than 1% on the day. But the divergence matters: when a couple of liquid, widely held names outperform in a down market, it often reflects rotation rather than broad risk appetite. Dogecoin’s moves are frequently momentum- and narrative-driven, while Ethereum’s strength can signal positioning around network upgrades, ETF flows, or simply “mean reversion” after sharp drawdowns.
Why the broader market is sliding again
The backdrop is a crypto market that’s been trying to stabilize after a brutal early-February selloff. Since the early-October peak, this asset class has lost about $2 trillion in value, with Bitcoin and Ether both posting steep year-to-date declines and ETF outflows cited as a key headwind. When liquidity thins and confidence is shaky, even modest macro surprises can push traders to de-risk quickly.
Tuesday’s weakness also echoed risk-off moves outside crypto. Experts linked Bitcoin’s dip to ongoing pressure in software shares, pointing to a sharp drop in the iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). The correlation is not perfect, but it’s a fact: Bitcoin often trades like a high-beta tech proxy when investors are toggling between “risk on” and “risk off.” Add a calendar packed with macro catalysts, and it doesn’t take much for the market to wobble. With the Federal Reserve’s meeting minutes due Wednesday afternoon, traders are reluctant to press longs aggressively ahead of any hint that rate cuts could be delayed.
Liquidations added fuel to the situation. CoinGlass data showed roughly $195 million in crypto positions liquidated over the past 24 hours, with long positions taking the bulk of the hit. That pattern is consistent with a market that keeps attempting rebounds, then gets clipped when prices break below short-term support, forcing leveraged traders to exit. In other words, the selling can become mechanical, and the bounce that follows can be just as reflexive.
Why does the cryptocurrency state matter?
When the market deteriorates, the consequences show up in what crypto is actually used for, and in what people stop using it for.
Payments and remittances can lean harder toward stablecoins. Regulators have long argued that volatile tokens struggle as day-to-day money; the Financial Stability Board notes mainstream payment use remains limited because major crypto-assets lack stability as a store of value and unit of account, and can face performance constraints. In certain sectors, it has another secondary effect. For example, in casinos that accept cryptocurrencies, the cryptos you have not withdrawn before the worsening of the situation have less value.
But this stress-tests stablecoins too. The IMF warns that wide adoption can bring run risk and reserve-asset fire sales, encouraging currency substitution in weaker monetary jurisdictions unless rules and interoperability are robust.
Infrastructure gets squeezed. Falling prices compress miners’ margins, pushing less efficient operators toward shutdowns or consolidation. The Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index reported that at higher power costs, some miners can operate at a loss when prices drop, reducing hashrate and concentrating mining in fewer hands.
Building slows—and forces a utility check. The Financial Times reported steep losses in major crypto investment strategies in 2025 alongside a broader downturn that also hit venture-style bets. The near-term effect is fewer subsidies and a tougher environment for new consumer-facing apps; the longer-term effect is that projects have to prove utility—payments, settlement, custody, compliance—instead of relying on a rising market to do the marketing for them.