cryptonews.net
Incident reports and blockchain analysis in the industry published by industry sites and security analysts reported a loss of $1.78 million at Decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol Moonwell after a critical oracle pricing error that briefly underpriced the Coinbase Wrapped Staked $ETH token (cbETH) at about $1.12 compared to its real market value of about 2,200.
The wrong pricing due to the misconfigured oracle integration resulted in immediate liquidations and immediate collateral seizure of automated market participants. More than 1,096 cbETH were liquidated by liquidation bots and arbitrage participants as a result of the event, which increased the overall bad debt recorded by the protocol.
Source: X
This catastrophe was based on an error in the Oracle framework that arose when on February 15, 2026 at around 6:01 PM UTC, Moonwell turned on a governance proposal to empower novice Chainlink OEV (Oracle Extractable Value) wrapper agreements on its Base network markets. The system ignored the fact that to compute a proper price of the cbETH in USD, the exchange rate between cbETH and $ETH should have been multiplied with the $ETH/USD price by wrongly computing through the raw rate of the cbETH/$ETH exchange rate, (Its value of which is approximately 1.12) and representing it as a dollar price.
This mistake caused a pricing error of more than 99.9, the on-chain valuation of the USD of cbETH to fall significantly off its actual market value of nearly $2,200 to an on-chain valuation of circa 1.12.
Rapid Liquidations and Losses Within Minutes
Since the price feeds that define collateral health in DeFi lending platforms are real-time, the price distortion immediately made many positions that are backed by cbETH under-collateralized. In only four minutes, oracle update had taken place, bots and automated liquidators responded to the faulty valuation, repaying small debts and taking out massive amounts of cbETH collateral at such unjust terms.
By the anthias Labs, the risk manager of Moonwell, set up emergency caps on borrowing and delivering to the impacted markets, the system had already documented: 1,779,044.83 bad debt in several asset markets; 1,096.317 cbETH liquidated; Additional losses in several assets, such as WETH, USDC, EURC, and cbBTC, among others.
These secondary effects turned what was initially a protocol misconfiguration of prices into a financial undercut across the protocol.
External analysts and Smart contract auditors have also cited development artifacts suggesting that some of the faulty code was co-authored by an AI model, namely Claude Opus 4.6, when updating the code. Active on social media, the auditor Pashov highlighted the commits and implied that the intervention of AI could have been the reason behind the logic error.
But Moonwell itself has not publicly supported the belief that AI has caused the error itself and other critics note that it is the human review and auditing process that ultimately caused the mistake and not the tools applied to create the code.
This fact has raised industry issues concerning risks and control responsibility relating to AI-aided coding, especially with regard to mission-critical financial infrastructure, but not every source is convinced that AI proximately caused the exploit.
Governance Response and Market Impact
After the adventure, the community of governance in Moonwell started taking the course of remediation. A recovery plan was presented to the governance forum of the protocol describing how they would compensate users who had been affected as well as restructure some of its decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) structure.
Some mitigation measures involved setting borrow and supply limits to about zero on the cbETH market, in the meantime, to avoid further negative impacts of the situation under the conditions of the on-going governance process.
The incident did not seem to affect markets in the Optimism network, since it was confined to the cbETH core market in Base.
One of the strongest weaknesses of DeFi lending platforms have always been perceived to be oracle pricing errors since they inject real-world asset price data into on-chain logic. This incident is not the first big-profile mispricing incident of the last few years and it demonstrates the importance of the correct oracle integration to the protocol stability.
The industry analysts who have evaluated the Moonwell data point out that even small configuration errors can facilitate excessive financial effects in automated markets, particularly when liquidation processes run without human intervention and in a few seconds.
A governance vote will follow the required timelock of five days set by the Moonwell rules of the DAO, as a result of which fixes cannot be made on-chain. Community proposals have been arguing on the question of whether to calculate compensation in the case of their net losses instead of complete compensation on the basis of the collateral which was lost, which is a subtle measure of ensuring fairness and sustainability.
It is observed that the incident may be used as a case study of the risk of automated development tools and the irreversible effects of oracle misconfigurations in financial smart contracts, which might encourage other DeFi projects to enhance their code review and testing processes.