cryptopolitan.com
قامت مبادرة الشركة بتثبيت Bitcoin كمصدر للقيمة وكوسيلة أفضل للتحوط ضد التضخم، مما يقلل من ظهورها كأصل مضارب. في حين أن Microstrategy وSaylor كانتا أكثر ثباتًا من معظمهما، فقد كانت الكيانات الأخرى أيضًا جزءًا لا يتجزأ من الترويج للأصول.
مدافع Ethereum يطرح قضيته
أثار سؤال المدافع عن ETH ضجة كبيرة على X. فقد أسقط العديد من المستخدمين آراءهم، وناقشوا بإسهاب سبب احتياج مساحة ETH إلى بطل خاص بها رفيع المستوى. وأشار أحد المستخدمين إلى أن ذلك سيكون أمرًا لا يصدق، مشيرًا إلى أن تأثير الشخص سيقدم حقًا مساعدة كبيرة لـ Ethereum .
ما زلت أعتقد أن هناك فرصة هائلة تمامًا لشخص ما ليصبح شخصية تشبه سايلور في Ethereum
— sassal.eth/acc 🦇🔊 (@sassal0x) 22 ديسمبر 2024
مجرد شراء ETH بلا هوادة بغض النظر عن السعر ثم بيع ETH (و Ethereum !) إلى ما لا نهاية للجمهور السائد
أتمنى لو كان لدي المال للقيام بذلك بنفسي 😅
Another user claimed there could be a concentrated decentralized effort, noting that the action could see input from influencers, whales, and other users in the space. One mentioned that a centralized figure could help boost ETH’s price, using structured mechanics. The user suggested a model that will include bonding, token boosts, and borrowing mechanisms, noting that it could help accelerate the price of the token. One user talked about yield integration, noting that it could make the strategy very effective.
Meanwhile, some users brought up examples of personalities that they felt could fill the gap. A user suggested Bit Digital CEO Samir Tabar, highlighting that his company mines Bitcoin to accumulate Ethereum, a move that has helped to promote ETH as a proxy.
Others also proposed other candidates, with a user highlighting the influence that United States President-elect Donald Trump could have on the price of Ethereum. He mentioned that his pro-crypto stance could be pivotal in shaping the future of the asset.
Challenges and the wider implications for Ethereum
The initiative, however, didn’t go down well with others, with most of them highlighting the dangers of centralized influence. A user noted that Saylor’s present and growing influence might be detrimental to the asset, noting that he holds about 2% of the total Bitcoin supply. The user noted that the development could deter others from adopting the asset, noting that a central person for Ethereum could face the same criticism.
Others also talked about how hard it is to create a company that will sustain the same hunger for Ethereum as the one Microstrategy has for Bitcoin. A user said Ethereum’s 75 million token during its pre-sale creates a unique dynamic that would discourage an entity from taking up a central role. One user also said there could be conflict of interest issues, noting that large holders or validators may not want to become a centralized figure to protect their positions within the network.
In addition, other users talked about Ethereum’s ecosystem and its unique characteristics. A user talked about the state of the network without a ‘champion’ like Saylor, suggesting that someone like Bankless could fill the role. Meanwhile, another user said the decentralized nature of the network makes it hard for it to rely on a central figure like Saylor for advocacy. The conversation also trickled into the relationship between Bitcoin and Ethereum, with a user highlighting Bitcoin’s 21 million cap makes it suitable for high-scale holding.
Land a High-Paying Web3 Job in 90 Days: The Ultimate Roadmap